<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>news | OJ Watson</title><link>https://ojwatson.co.uk/categories/news/</link><atom:link href="https://ojwatson.co.uk/categories/news/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>news</description><generator>Source Themes Academic (https://sourcethemes.com/academic/)</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>© 2026 OJ Watson</copyright><lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>AI for epidemic modelling: Nature 2025 and tool development</title><link>https://ojwatson.co.uk/2026/02/16/ai-epidemic-modelling-nature-2025/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://ojwatson.co.uk/2026/02/16/ai-epidemic-modelling-nature-2025/</guid><description>&lt;p>I recently contributed to &lt;strong>Nature (2025)&lt;/strong> on artificial intelligence for infectious disease epidemic modelling. The paper reviews how modern AI methods can support epidemic forecasting, surveillance, intervention planning, and model acceleration while still needing careful public-health interpretation.&lt;/p>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>Paper: &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08564-w">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08564-w&lt;/a>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Related tool: &lt;a href="https://ojwatson.co.uk/project/emidm/">emidm&lt;/a>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Related research section: &lt;a href="https://ojwatson.co.uk/research/#ai-enabled-epidemic-modelling">AI-enabled epidemic modelling&lt;/a>&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;p>Alongside this, my group continues work on emulator-based approaches that improve calibration speed and scenario exploration for policy-facing analyses. The aim is practical: make complex infectious disease models easier to interrogate under uncertainty, without losing sight of the assumptions that make those models useful.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Humanitarian modelling: forecast evaluation and policy translation</title><link>https://ojwatson.co.uk/2026/02/16/humanitarian-forecast-evaluation-policy/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://ojwatson.co.uk/2026/02/16/humanitarian-forecast-evaluation-policy/</guid><description>&lt;p>A continuing focus is improving how epidemic forecasts are evaluated and interpreted for policy decisions in resource-constrained and crisis contexts.&lt;/p>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>medRxiv preprint: &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.11.25333414">https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.11.25333414&lt;/a>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>SocArXiv perspective: &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/tcjqs_v1">https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/tcjqs_v1&lt;/a>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Related tools: &lt;a href="https://ojwatson.co.uk/project/vrcmort/">vrcmort&lt;/a> and &lt;a href="https://ojwatson.co.uk/project/vpdsus/">vpdsus&lt;/a>&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;p>These outputs sit alongside ongoing work on mortality estimation, vaccine-preventable disease risk, cholera anticipatory action, and the translation of model evidence into humanitarian decision-making.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>See the &lt;a href="https://ojwatson.co.uk/research/#humanitarian-evidence-for-humanitarian-operations">Humanitarian evidence for humanitarian operations&lt;/a> section for context.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Lancet Global Health 2024: impact of the 100 Days Mission</title><link>https://ojwatson.co.uk/2026/02/16/lancet-global-health-100-days-mission/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://ojwatson.co.uk/2026/02/16/lancet-global-health-100-days-mission/</guid><description>&lt;p>Our &lt;strong>Lancet Global Health (2024)&lt;/strong> study quantified the expected impact of accelerating vaccine availability under the 100 Days Mission framework.&lt;/p>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>Paper: &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00286-9">https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00286-9&lt;/a>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Related prior work: &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00320-6">Global impact of first-year COVID-19 vaccination (Lancet ID, 2022)&lt;/a>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Related tools: &lt;a href="https://ojwatson.co.uk/project/squire/">squire&lt;/a>, &lt;a href="https://ojwatson.co.uk/project/nimue/">nimue&lt;/a>, &lt;a href="https://ojwatson.co.uk/project/vece/">vece&lt;/a>&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;p>This work estimates how much faster vaccine availability could change pandemic outcomes, and where the benefits are most likely to depend on realistic delivery and access constraints. It is a useful link between methodological modelling and the operational planning questions that determine whether vaccines reach people in time.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>This sits within the &lt;a href="https://ojwatson.co.uk/research/#vaccine-impact-and-pandemic-preparedness">Vaccine impact and preparedness&lt;/a> strand of my research.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Nature Medicine 2025: global pfhrp2/3 deletion risk</title><link>https://ojwatson.co.uk/2026/02/16/nature-medicine-pfhrp23-risk/</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://ojwatson.co.uk/2026/02/16/nature-medicine-pfhrp23-risk/</guid><description>&lt;p>A key recent output is our &lt;strong>Nature Medicine (2025)&lt;/strong> paper on the global risk of selection and spread of &lt;em>Plasmodium falciparum&lt;/em> pfhrp2/3 deletions.&lt;/p>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>Paper: &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/S41591-025-03974-3">https://doi.org/10.1038/S41591-025-03974-3&lt;/a>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Related modelling background: &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25008">eLife 2017 pfhrp2 deletion modelling&lt;/a>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Related software: &lt;a href="https://ojwatson.co.uk/project/hrp2malaria/">hrp2malaRia&lt;/a> and &lt;a href="https://ojwatson.co.uk/project/hrpup/">hrpup&lt;/a>&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;p>This work builds on several years of modelling, surveillance, and policy-facing analysis around malaria rapid diagnostic test performance. The central question is an operational one: where and when might pfhrp2/3 deletions undermine diagnosis, and how should surveillance adapt?&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The paper links directly to my broader &lt;a href="https://ojwatson.co.uk/research/#malaria-transmission-modelling">Malaria research&lt;/a> and WHO-facing policy support activities.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>